It strikes me that separating packages that have a relationship to ghc
always seems to introduce a maintenance burden. Even with the core
relationships moved to ghc-base, this might be a problem.
brandon s allbery kf8nh
allbery.b@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025, 14:23 Matthew Pickering
Hi all,
I'm trying to establish consensus around the next stages of the reinstallable base project.
It seems to me the next step is to move the `base` package out of the GHC tree into a separate repo so it can be maintained like a normal haskell package.
If you have an opinion then please leave your feedback on this email thread.
The issue is discussed here: https://github.com/haskell/core-libraries-committee/issues/375 and also on discourse
https://discourse.haskell.org/t/what-are-the-next-steps-for-reinstallable-ba...
Cheers,
Matt _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list -- ghc-devs@haskell.org To unsubscribe send an email to ghc-devs-leave@haskell.org