
2016-09-26 9:00 GMT+02:00 Ben Gamari
Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
writes: Friends
GHC has a flag -XImpredicativeTypes that makes a half-hearted attempt to support impredicative polymorphism. But it is vestigial.... if it works, it's really a fluke. We don't really have a systematic story here at all.
Out of curiosity, what ever happened to the most recent attempt at addressing impredicativity [1]?
It turned our that the new system being proposed was not better than the current one. In particular, it was almost impossible to know upfront whether a program using impredicative types would need an annotation to typecheck. Furthermore, I think it would imply a humongous amount of changes to GHC, for not a very large gain.
As far as the proposal process is concerned, it would likely be a good idea to put together a proposal so we have somewhere to collect comments. That being said, it needn't be terribly lengthy given that we are merely removing a feature.
Incidentally, that reminds me that I have some documentation fixes to the ghc-proposals repository that I should proof-read and push.
Cheers,
- Ben
[1] https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ImpredicativePolymorphism/ Impredicative-2015
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs