30 Jul
2015
30 Jul
'15
8:25 a.m.
INLINE[n] becomes ONLY_INLINE_FROM[n] NOINLINE[n] becomes ONLY_NOINLINE_BEFORE[n] ... And I am not even sure if ONLY_INLINE_FROM has the connotation of definite inlining to every reader...
ONLY_INLINE_FROM is problematic indeed, because it could just as well mean the same as MAY_INLINE_FROM. I still think we should consider splitting up the original INLINE[n] pragma into two simpler pragmas (it currently does two things, whereas NOINLINE[n] does only one thing). Here' another suggestion (note that phases count down): INLINE[2] becomes NO_INLINE > 2, INLINE <= 2 NOINLINE[2] becomes NO_INLINE > 2 Or, if we don't want two separate pragmas: INLINE[2] becomes INLINE_IFF <= 2 NOINLINE[2] becomes NOINLINE > 2