
1 Mar
2013
1 Mar
'13
1:16 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 05:48:12PM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Geoff thinks that the sync-all script has code for deciding whether to add the ".git" or not, but the code was omitted when adding the sub-module stuff.
Result: in subsequent stuff, git looks in a darcs repo, with consequent terribly confusing results.
Is anyone still using the darcs support in sync-all? i.e. does anyone object to me removing it? Thanks Ian