On 2014-09-22 at 14:31:10 +0200, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
Forwarding this & my reply to the ML as well,
On 22/09/14 14:27, David Luposchainsky wrote:
+1. While you're at it, you may also want to consider allowing leading commas for the folks that write their exports/records "the other way round" Sure. Both styles are common in the wild, so that makes sense.
+1 (I'd even say that leading-comma style is the predominant one these days thanks to [1] et al.) Let's be a bit more conrete. Where everywhere shall leading+trailing commas be supported, here's a few places OTTOMH, where comma-separated entities occur which may or may not benefit from this treatment: - list-syntax (+ even in pattern position?) - module import/export list - record syntax (+ patterns?) - pattern-guards - language pragmas - ...? [1]: https://github.com/tibbe/haskell-style-guide/blob/master/haskell-style.md