
Yeah, this should work with UndecidableInstances. The reason you need that
extension is that if we consider the context, then there are some
pathological examples that can make GHC's instance checking algorithm go
forever.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Gabor Greif
No. I'll switch that on and report back.
Thanks,
Gabor
Em sexta-feira, 31 de julho de 2015, Simon Peyton Jones < simonpj@microsoft.com> escreveu:
you need "liberal coverage checking", so UndecidableInstances. Are you doing that?
| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of | Richard Eisenberg | Sent: 31 July 2015 16:10 | To: Gabor Greif | Cc: ghc-devs | Subject: Re: Fundep question | | Let's rewrite with explicit kind variables, noting that b is also | poly-kinded: | | class Dep k k2 (a :: k) (b :: k2) | a -> b k2 | -- if a determines b, it surely determines k2 | | instance Dep k * x y => Dep (Maybe k) * (Just x) (Maybe y) | | Actually, even with the kinds explicit, it still looks valid to me. | Post a bug report? | | Richard | | On Jul 31, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Gabor Greif
wrote: | | > Hi all, | > | > say I want to instantiate | > | > class Dep (a :: k) b | a -> b | > | > as | > | > instance Dep x y => Dep (Just x) (Maybe y) | > | > Is this supposed to work? I get "The coverage condition fails" | errors. | > | > For simple cases like | > | > instance Dep True Bool | > | > etc. it seems to work fine. | > | > Thanks and cheers, | > | > Gabor | > _______________________________________________ | > ghc-devs mailing list | > ghc-devs@haskell.org | > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs | | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs