22 Jan
2016
22 Jan
'16
11:39 a.m.
On 1/22/16 11:36 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
On 2016-01-22 at 17:23:18 +0100, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
I didn't mean to suggest that DPH should be part of every build, just that it should be part of *some* regular build.
If we're willing to do that, then I'm certainly willing to get DPH back up and running. What's the situation with the `vector`/`primitive` packages if DPH is to be resuscitated? Does the official `vector` package need to be made DPH-aware?
The vector and primitive packages will not need to be changed in any significant way, and perhaps not at all. It's possible we might need a few patches to vector to, e.g., expose a data constructor somewhere, so I can't promise that we will need zero changes. Geoff