RE: INLINE pragmas

| INLINE[n] becomes INLINEFROM[n] | NOINLINE[n] becomes NOINLINEBEFORE[n] | INLINE[~n] becomes INLINEBEFORE[n] | NOINLINE[~n] becomes NOINLINEFROM[n] I'd be fine with these. Maybe INLINE_FROM etc to split the words. If someone wants to - make a ticket - make a proposal and get feedback - implement, as synonyms for the existing things that'd be great. | BTW, the docs say about NOINLINE “You shouldn't ever need to do this, | unless you're very cautious about code size.” – should this also | mention that NOINLINE are often necessary with RULES? Good idea Simon