19 Nov
2013
19 Nov
'13
5:17 p.m.
so what are you proposing? Are you agreeing that those patches work with
clang wrapper, but also remarking that its unfortunate that such a hack is
needed?
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kazu Yamamoto
So did you find a bug in the current design of the clang-wrapper hack?
No. What I found is that the current design of the clang-wrapper hack is appropriate.
"-x assembler-with-cpp" is necessary to rescue ---- {-# RULE whatever #-} ---
If so it'd be better to get it fixed there rather than in the Alex/happy setup HS files.
If we can do this, it's very good. But this is not good enough. happy/alex hack are also necessary to not generate ---- # 1 "<built-inxxx>" 1
# 1 "templates/GenericTemplatexxx.hs" 2 ----
--Kazu