Sounds good to me too.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Simon Peyton Jones
OK with me! Sounds simpler.
Simon
| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of | Herbert Valerio Riedel | Sent: 13 April 2014 08:59 | To: ghc-devs | Cc: Austin Seipp | Subject: Folding in base, integer-{gmp, single}, ghc-prim, and haskell- | template into ghc.git | | Hello *, | | Now that GHC 7.8.[12] is out of the door, the Git reorganization can be | tackled further... | | After a short conversion with Austin and Edward it appears that the | sensible course of action with respect towards moving to a proper Git | submodule set-up is to fold-in the 5 Git repos listed below (which btw | are all GHC wired-in packages) directly into ghc.git (the same way | testsuite.git was a few months ago): | | - base | - ghc-prim | - integer-gmp | - integer-simple | - template-haskell | | IMO, the benefit/cost ratio of simplifying the workflow outweighs the | benefit/cost ratio of turning those into proper Git submodules. | | This incremental step towards a fully git-bisect-able ghc.git does | already allow bisecting to work on a larger time-range than it does | now, as those wired-in packages are the most likely to break | compilation if out-of-sync with ghc.git. | | If no objections are raised, I'm planning to implement this change next | weekend (April 19th/20th). | | Any comments/questions/...? | | Cheers, | hvr | | | | PS: After this step, the next remaining step would be to turn the | remaining not-yet-submodule Git repos into proper submodule Repos | (like haddock.git) and figure out how to get the sync-all | convenience-tooling a bit more submodule friendly... | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs