For what it’s worth, I’ve never found phab / arc to be the bottle neck /
actual time consuming piece of doing anything for ghc
It’s defintely the nicest code review substrate I’ve engaged with
One question I have : how does the llvm org manage / handle their
phabricator instance and or ci substrate. Maybe they have wisdom that can
help ?
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 7:27 PM Vladislav Zavialov
To put my 2¢ – I will be happy with whatever service provides the most reliable CI.
In terms of workflow, I like Ben's suggestion:
* Consider a PR to be a stack of differentials, with each commit being an atomic change in that stack. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs