RE: isInvisible

It’d be great if you could. I’m about to commit a patch, but it doesn’t affect this much. (It’s just that getting the patch right made me fall into the swamp) S From: Richard Eisenberg [mailto:eir@cis.upenn.edu] Sent: 23 June 2016 14:17 To: Simon Peyton Jones Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org Subject: Re: isInvisible * Required * Specified * Inferred I like that. Much more self-explanatory. Shall we go for it? Sure. Now, who gets to do the work? :) Are you in the middle of a refactor around this? If not, I can do this this afternoon. Richard