-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 23/09/14 09:31, Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
Well, it *is* a language extension, exactly like lots of other language extensions, isn't it? (E.g. UnicodeSyntax.) What alternative action, exactly, are you proposing? Why do you propose to treat it differently to other language extensions? I would be reluctant to simply add it without any indication; then GHC would accept non-Haskell 2010 programs. And we have not done that with other extensions. If this policy has been followed that firmly then I too am reluctant to go against it. A pragma it is then.
Alexander alexander@plaimi.net https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlQhI9gACgkQRtClrXBQc7X4kAEAn5XrGTFZa0AR372xPEKS2ddE vt5DYJ+wU+xjYW6HYSYBAKMqdL3bO7Q8GNNQmX4OQhcrwvpQcSov17F2E5FyFrI/ =BGZA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----