22 Jul
2013
22 Jul
'13
11:04 p.m.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:51:49PM -0700, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
changing the default umask on the entire server is not necessary to fix this problem. Git already has support for exactly this use case
Well, I don't mind if someone wants to do the git thing too, but I think we want a umask of 002 regardless. Thanks Ian -- Ian Lynagh, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/