
Hi, Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 19:48 +0000 schrieb Michal Terepeta:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:56 PM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:45 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari:
We could also create a cabal and stack files for `nofib-analyse` (making it possible to use some libraries for it).
This would be great. This would allow me to drop a submodule from my own performance monitoring tool.
Exists since last April: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/nofib-analyse
Only the binary so far, though, but good enough for "cabal install nofib-analyse".
Oh, interesting! But now I'm a bit confused - what's the relationship
between https://github.com/nomeata/nofib-analyse and https://git.haskell.org/nofib.git, e.g., is the github repo the upstream for nofib-anaylse and the haskell.org one for the other parts of nofib? Or is the github one just a mirror and all patches should go to haskell.org repo?
my repo occasionally pulls in the nofib-analyse directory from the haskell.org nofib repo; see for example this commit (especially its message): https://github.com/nomeata/nofib-analyse/commit/8225e0dd84c3c31cd156d10df75e... So yes, patches go to the haskell.org nofib repo (or Phab or whatever). Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org