18 Oct
2014
18 Oct
'14
1:52 p.m.
On 18 October 2014 19:05, Mateusz Kowalczyk
Sounds interesting. My only request/comment is that I hope whatever conclusion you come to, the library part of it will be usable just as much (or even more) as the executable: if we can talk to the library natively then that's much easier than talking to some remote socket and parsing out data.
I'm not sure what GHC HQ would think of GHCi exposing an API, but certainly I'm for it. Yi would have no reason to talk via JSON API if it could just call the functions in a type-safe way directly, or at least have an API that does the talking to the remote socket so that you don't have to.