
Hello Ömer,
Just a week ago I asked very similar question: how to install the test
suite dependencies after breaking changes in GHC:
https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2018-August/016075.html
But no one replied :(
The task seems to be not solvable even if an affected package (stm in your
case and primitive in mine) has already adopted in its master the breaking
change but has no corresponding release on Hackage (which will always be
the case, because how would you release depending on base which hasn't been
released yet).
Some package managers in other languages (Julia's Pkg, go install) allow
you to depend directly on master branch of a package if you wish to. I
wonder if there is a road here for cabal to take in order to support this
kind of unsafe installs.
--
Best wishes,
Artem
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, 11:40 Ömer Sinan Ağacan,
Hi,
This is working great, I just generated my first report. One problem is stm-2.4 doesn't compile with GHC HEAD, we need stm-2.5.0.0. But that's not published on Hackage yet, and latest nightly still uses stm-2.4.5.0. I wonder if there's anything that can be done about this. Apparently stm blocks 82 packages (I don't know if that's counting transitively or just packages that are directly blocked by stm). Any ideas about this?
Ömer
Ömer Sinan Ağacan
, 9 Ağu 2018 Per, 14:45 tarihinde şunu yazdı: Ah, I now realize that that command is supposed to print that output.
I'll
continue following the steps and keep you updated if I get stuck again.
Ömer
Ömer Sinan Ağacan
, 9 Ağu 2018 Per, 13:20 tarihinde şunu yazdı: Hi Manuel,
I'm trying stackage-head. I'm following the steps for the scheduled
build in
.circleci/config.yml. So far steps I took:
- Installed ghc-head (from [1]) to ~/ghc-head - Installed stackage-build-plan, stackage-curator and stackage-head (with -fdev) from git repos, using stack. - export BUILD_PLAN=nightly-2018-07-30 (from config.yml) - curl https://ghc-artifacts.s3.amazonaws.com/nightly/validate-x86_64-linux/latest/... --output metadata.json - curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fpco/stackage-nightly/master/$BUILD_PLAN.y... --output $BUILD_PLAN.yaml
Now I'm doing
- ./.local/bin/stackage-head already-seen --target $BUILD_PLAN --ghc-metadata metadata.json --outdir build-reports
but it's failing with
The combination of target and commit is new to me
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks
[1]: https://ghc-artifacts.s3.amazonaws.com/nightly/validate-x86_64-linux/latest/...
Ömer
Ömer Sinan Ağacan
, 7 Ağu 2018 Sal, 23:28 tarihinde şunu yazdı: Thanks for both suggestions. I'll try both and see which one works
better.
Ömer
Manuel M T Chakravarty
, 7 Ağu 2018 Sal, 18:15 tarihinde şunu yazdı: Hi Ömer,
This is exactly the motivation for the Stackage HEAD works that we
have pushed at Tweag I/O in the context of the GHC DevOps group. Have a look at
https://github.com/tweag/stackage-head
and also the blog post from when the first version went live:
https://www.tweag.io/posts/2018-04-17-stackage-head-is-live.html
Cheers, Manuel
Am 06.08.2018 um 09:40 schrieb Ömer Sinan Ağacan <
omeragacan@gmail.com>:
Hi,
I'd like to test some GHC builds + some compile and runtime flag
combinations
against a large set of packages by building them and running test suites. For this I need
- A set of packages that are known to work with latest GHC - A way to build them and run their test suites (if I could specify compile and runtime flags that'd be even better)
I think stackage can serve as (1) but I don't know how to do (2). Can anyone point me to the right direction? I vaguely remember some nix-based solution for this that was being discussed on the IRC channel, but can't recall any details.
Thanks,
Ömer _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs