i'm inclined to assume that its a parser error.
instead of (v)= call fun(args...argn);, did you try v = call fun(args1...n)
; ?
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel
On 2014-01-05 at 00:26:52 +0100, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
[...]
So is this valid high-level Cmm code? What's the proper way to allocate Stack (and/or Heap) memory from high-level Cmm code?
PS: ...are function calls supposed to work as advertised in
https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/master/compiler/cmm/CmmParse.y#L76
?
I've tried using `(ret1,ret2) = call stg_fun (arg1,arg2);` in a Cmm file, but I get a parser error on `call` with GHC HEAD; only when leave out the return value assignement, i.e. when I use only `call stg_fun (arg1,arg2);`, it gets parsed succesfully. Is this a bug in the CmmParser?
Cheers, hvr _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs