one thing I wonder about is how should we approach noting
"theres a new language constructor, we should figure out a good way to
present it in haddock" in this work flow?
because the initial haddocks presentation might just be a strawman till
someone thinks about it carefully right?
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel
On 2014-08-14 at 00:09:40 +0200, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
[...]
I don't know what the GHC branch name will be yet. ‘ghc-head’ makes most sense but IIRC Herbert had some objections as it had been used in the past for something else, but maybe he can pitch in.
I had no objections at all to that name, 'ghc-head' is fine with me :-) _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs