Re: Including libffi as a submodule

John Wiegley writes:

...

...

...

...

...

"BG" == Ben Gamari writes:

BG> Note that under this scheme it will still be possible to link against the BG> system's libffi installation using ./configure's --enable-system-libffi BG> flag.

Will distributions of GHC be using a system libffi which still has the bugs you mentioned?

My inclination would be to use the system libffi unless this option is precluded due to bugs. By this standard I believe the only GHC HQ binary distributions which would include an unreleased libffi would those for ARM and AArch64. Cheers, - Ben