Re: How should we treat changes to the GHC API?

On Jul 27, 2020, at 5:24 PM, John Ericson wrote:

As permanent solution I don't like it, but as a stop gap to relieve any pressure for stability until we have sane interfaces, I *love* it.

I guess I'm arguing that ghc-lib (or something like it) should be the permanent solution. GHC will always be in flux internally. Richard