3 Sep
2015
3 Sep
'15
6:43 a.m.
On 03/09/2015 10:53, Thomas Miedema wrote:
The real hint is that "the number of contributions will go up". That's a noble goal and I think it's at the heart of this proposal.
When you're going to require contributors to use a non-standard tool to get patches to your code review system, it better just work. `arc` is clearly failing us here, and I'm saying enough is enough.
Not only this, but there's (probably) lots of small/janitorial contributions that do not need the full power of phabricator or any sophisticated code review. Not accepting github PRs and forcing everyone to go through an uncommon tool (however formidable), is quite likely to turn those contributions away IMHO. -- Vincent