Re: Why not rebase instead of merge?

Somebody claiming to be David Terei wrote:

doing this allows me when working to make commits more arbitrarily, such that it suits my development flow. (e.g., a commit simply because I'm changing from workstation to laptop). Fixing up after the work is done can result in much nicer, more atomic commits. i.e., hindsight and all that.

Ah, this makes sense. In the past I've seen people `rebase -i` to squash an entire feature branch into a single commit, and similar, which is less atomic. -- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma See http://singpolyma.net for how I prefer to be contacted edition right joseph