
I'm seeing this in validate bytes allocated value is too low: (If this is because you have improved GHC, please update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again) Expected T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 56782344 +/-7% Lower bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 52807579 Upper bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 60757109 Actual T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 52424864 Deviation T5837(normal) bytes allocated: -7.7 % *** unexpected stat test failure for T5837(normal) Does anyone else? Simon

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
I'm seeing this in validate
bytes allocated value is too low:
(If this is because you have improved GHC, please
update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again)
Expected T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 56782344 +/-7%
Lower bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 52807579
Upper bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 60757109
Actual T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 52424864
Deviation T5837(normal) bytes allocated: -7.7 %
*** unexpected stat test failure for T5837(normal)
This test has historically been quite unstable. I'm running a validate as we speak; I'll let you know if I can reproduce this. Cheers, - Ben

Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-devs
I'm seeing this in validate
bytes allocated value is too low:
(If this is because you have improved GHC, please
update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again)
Expected T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 56782344 +/-7%
Lower bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 52807579
Upper bound T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 60757109
Actual T5837(normal) bytes allocated: 52424864
Deviation T5837(normal) bytes allocated: -7.7 %
*** unexpected stat test failure for T5837(normal) Does anyone else?
Unfortunately I'm not seeing this locally. It sounds like yet another environmentally-sensitive issue. Perhaps we should just bump it. Cheers, - Ben

Bump it down, maybe... it got /better/!
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Ben Gamari [mailto:ben@smart-cactus.org]
| Sent: 14 September 2017 16:54
| To: Simon Peyton Jones
participants (2)
-
Ben Gamari
-
Simon Peyton Jones