It used to be, but cryptonite has been unmaintained for a couple of years now and that's somewhat bad for a security-related package. On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 2:55 PM Roland Lutz <rlutz@hedmen.org> wrote:

On Fri, 6 Mar 2026, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:

...

Bottom line, the two variants of `mlkem` don't end up offering the same API (distinct type signatures, that only look the same).

Isn't this exactly what Backpack modules are for? If `mlkem` and `tls` imported a signature for `crypton`/`cryptonite`, depending on either of these should have `mlkem` and `tls` use the correct version of the API.

I'm not sure what to make of "somewhat experimental", though: https://cabal.readthedocs.io/en/stable/how-to-use-backpack.html

It may already have been considered, but wouldn't making `tls` compatible with `cryptonite` solve the issue, too?

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list -- haskell-cafe@haskell.org To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

-- brandon s allbery kf8nh allbery.b@gmail.com