Validate failures

newer
No instance for (Fractional Int32)

Simon Marlow

1 Feb 2013 1 Feb '13

3:57 a.m.

A batch of testsuite failures this morning - forgotten push to testsuite perhaps? Unexpected failures: perf/should_run T5113 [stat not good enough] (normal) simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal) typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal) typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal) Cheers, Simon

Show replies by date

Simon Peyton-Jones

1 Feb 1 Feb

9:51 a.m.

yes, see earlier email on this. almost certainly my fault, will fix Monday | -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] On | Behalf Of Simon Marlow | Sent: 01 February 2013 08:57 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Validate failures | | A batch of testsuite failures this morning - forgotten push to testsuite | perhaps? | | Unexpected failures: | perf/should_run T5113 [stat not good enough] (normal) | simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal) | typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | | Cheers, | Simon | | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Simon Marlow

7 Feb 7 Feb

5:13 a.m.

These are still failing, BTW. Cheers, Simon On 01/02/13 14:51, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:

...

yes, see earlier email on this. almost certainly my fault, will fix Monday

| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] On | Behalf Of Simon Marlow | Sent: 01 February 2013 08:57 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Validate failures | | A batch of testsuite failures this morning - forgotten push to testsuite | perhaps? | | Unexpected failures: | perf/should_run T5113 [stat not good enough] (normal) | simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal) | typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | | Cheers, | Simon | | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

José Pedro Magalhães

5:34 a.m.

For what it's worth, I got these failures with sh validate --fast in HEAD this morning: Unexpected failures: ../../libraries/directory/tests getPermissions001 [bad stdout] (normal) perf/compiler T1969 [stat too good] (normal) perf/compiler T3294 [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/compiler T4801 [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/compiler T783 [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.Cabal [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.base [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.compiler [stat too good] (normal) perf/should_run Conversions [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/should_run T4830 [stat too good] (normal) perf/should_run T5536 [stat too good] (normal) perf/should_run T7436 [stat too good] (normal) perf/should_run lazy-bs-alloc [stat too good] (normal) simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal) typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal) typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal) But then again, looking at it, I'm not sure what to do about the perf ones. Should we be more flexible in the expected result, or should I have fewer expectations about my machine being representative? And getPermissions001 might or might not have to do with the fact that this is on a virtual machine... Cheers, Pedro On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:

...

These are still failing, BTW.

Cheers, Simon

On 01/02/13 14:51, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:

...
yes, see earlier email on this. almost certainly my fault, will fix Monday

| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@** haskell.org ] On | Behalf Of Simon Marlow | Sent: 01 February 2013 08:57 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Validate failures | | A batch of testsuite failures this morning - forgotten push to testsuite | perhaps? | | Unexpected failures: | perf/should_run T5113 [stat not good enough] (normal) | simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal) | typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | | Cheers, | Simon | | ______________________________**_________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

______________________________**_________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Ian Lynagh

8:31 a.m.

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:34:51AM +0000, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:

...

But then again, looking at it, I'm not sure what to do about the perf ones. Should we be more flexible in the expected result, or should I have fewer expectations about my machine being representative?

I'm in the middle of fixing the bounds on all the perf tests on the tier 1 platforms, so hopefully this will improve soon.

...

And getPermissions001 might or might not have to do with the fact that this is on a virtual machine...

What platform are you on, and how is it failing? Thanks Ian

José Pedro Magalhães

8:37 a.m.

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:

...

...
And getPermissions001 might or might not have to do with the fact that this is on a virtual machine...

What platform are you on, and how is it failing?

I'm on Ubuntu 32bit running as guest OS on Win7 64bit. It fails as follows: @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ Permissions {readable = True, writable = True, executable = False, searchable = True} -Permissions {readable = True, writable = True, executable = False, searchable = False} +Permissions {readable = True, writable = True, executable = True, searchable = False} Permissions {readable = True, writable = True, executable = True, searchable = False} *** unexpected failure for getPermissions001(normal) Which is weird; getPermissions is saying that the file "getPermissions001.hs" is executable. But, then again, the file system is a mounted shared folder from NTFS, which is then accessed via a symbolic link... Thanks, Pedro

...

Thanks Ian

_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Ian Lynagh

10:24 a.m.

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:37:13PM +0000, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:

...

Which is weird; getPermissions is saying that the file "getPermissions001.hs" is executable. But, then again, the file system is a mounted shared folder from NTFS,

I suspect that all files in that filesystem appear to be executable. Thanks Ian

Simon Peyton-Jones

5:43 a.m.

I'm very sorry about this. I have been utterly flattened this week. S | -----Original Message----- | From: Simon Marlow [mailto:marlowsd@gmail.com] | Sent: 07 February 2013 10:14 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Validate failures | | These are still failing, BTW. | | Cheers, | Simon | | On 01/02/13 14:51, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > yes, see earlier email on this. almost certainly my fault, will fix Monday | > | > | -----Original Message----- | > | From: ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] | On | > | Behalf Of Simon Marlow | > | Sent: 01 February 2013 08:57 | > | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | > | Subject: Validate failures | > | | > | A batch of testsuite failures this morning - forgotten push to testsuite | > | perhaps? | > | | > | Unexpected failures: | > | perf/should_run T5113 [stat not good enough] (normal) | > | simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | > | simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | > | simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | > | simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | > | typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal) | > | typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | > | typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | > | | > | Cheers, | > | Simon | > | | > | _______________________________________________ | > | ghc-devs mailing list | > | ghc-devs@haskell.org | > | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs | >

Simon Peyton-Jones

8 Feb 8 Feb

7:21 p.m.

Should be fixed now, I think, except T5113 which really is a genuine old bug. I have a fix coming Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: Simon Marlow [mailto:marlowsd@gmail.com] | Sent: 07 February 2013 10:14 | To: Simon Peyton-Jones | Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: Validate failures | | These are still failing, BTW. | | Cheers, | Simon | | On 01/02/13 14:51, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > yes, see earlier email on this. almost certainly my fault, will fix Monday | > | > | -----Original Message----- | > | From: ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] | On | > | Behalf Of Simon Marlow | > | Sent: 01 February 2013 08:57 | > | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | > | Subject: Validate failures | > | | > | A batch of testsuite failures this morning - forgotten push to testsuite | > | perhaps? | > | | > | Unexpected failures: | > | perf/should_run T5113 [stat not good enough] (normal) | > | simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | > | simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | > | simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | > | simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | > | typecheck/should_compile holes [stderr mismatch] (normal) | > | typecheck/should_compile holes2 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | > | typecheck/should_compile holes3 [stderr mismatch] (normal) | > | | > | Cheers, | > | Simon | > | | > | _______________________________________________ | > | ghc-devs mailing list | > | ghc-devs@haskell.org | > | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs | >

4483

Age (days ago)

4491

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

8 comments

4 participants

participants (4)

Ian Lynagh
José Pedro Magalhães
Simon Marlow
Simon Peyton-Jones

Validate failures

tags

participants (4)