It does, yes. It’s on 0d157fe, which is the head of wip/spj-wildcard-refactor in the haddock repo Is that what get checked out by ‘git submodule update”? Simon From: Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.zimm@gmail.com] Sent: 18 November 2015 10:57 To: Simon Peyton Jones Subject: Re: Wildcard refactor I found the haddock library did not compile, but I am skipping straight to the tests. Does it compile for you at the moment? On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com<mailto:simonpj@microsoft.com>> wrote: Thank you! From: Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.zimm@gmail.com<mailto:alan.zimm@gmail.com>] Sent: 18 November 2015 10:04 To: Simon Peyton Jones Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org<mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org> Subject: Re: Wildcard refactor ok. I have been waiting to jump in and help. Alan On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com<mailto:simonpj@microsoft.com>> wrote: Alan I’m really close on wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, that I really want to get into HEAD asap. Could you possibly checkout wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, and validate? I get two failures I don’t understand: ghc-api/annotations listcomps [bad stdout] (normal) ghc-api/landmines landmines [bad stderr] (normal) The output is not wildly different but I just don’t know how to interpret it, so I don’t even know what the problem is exactly. NB: you’’ll need to do a ‘git submodule update’ because the haddock submodule changes. Thank you! Simon
Oh sorry, no I think I’d been skipping it too. I’ll fix that! Meanwhile, skip! From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Simon Peyton Jones Sent: 18 November 2015 11:18 To: Alan & Kim Zimmerman Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org Subject: RE: Wildcard refactor It does, yes. It’s on 0d157fe, which is the head of wip/spj-wildcard-refactor in the haddock repo Is that what get checked out by ‘git submodule update”? Simon From: Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.zimm@gmail.com] Sent: 18 November 2015 10:57 To: Simon Peyton Jones Subject: Re: Wildcard refactor I found the haddock library did not compile, but I am skipping straight to the tests. Does it compile for you at the moment? On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com<mailto:simonpj@microsoft.com>> wrote: Thank you! From: Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.zimm@gmail.com<mailto:alan.zimm@gmail.com>] Sent: 18 November 2015 10:04 To: Simon Peyton Jones Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org<mailto:ghc-devs@haskell.org> Subject: Re: Wildcard refactor ok. I have been waiting to jump in and help. Alan On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com<mailto:simonpj@microsoft.com>> wrote: Alan I’m really close on wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, that I really want to get into HEAD asap. Could you possibly checkout wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, and validate? I get two failures I don’t understand: ghc-api/annotations listcomps [bad stdout] (normal) ghc-api/landmines landmines [bad stderr] (normal) The output is not wildly different but I just don’t know how to interpret it, so I don’t even know what the problem is exactly. NB: you’’ll need to do a ‘git submodule update’ because the haddock submodule changes. Thank you! Simon
This is what I get locally unexpected results from: TEST="landmines listcomps T7861 T5837 T4896 T3064" OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Wed Nov 18 10:48:00 2015 UTC 0:27:16 spent to go through 4802 total tests, which gave rise to 18143 test cases, of which 13285 were skipped 77 had missing libraries 4667 expected passes 108 expected failures 0 caused framework failures 0 unexpected passes 5 unexpected failures 1 unexpected stat failures Unexpected failures: deriving/should_compile T4896 [exit code non-0] (normal) ghc-api/annotations listcomps [bad stdout] (normal) ghc-api/landmines landmines [bad stderr] (normal) perf/compiler T5837 [stderr mismatch] (normal) typecheck/should_run T7861 [bad stderr] (normal) Unexpected stat failures: perf/compiler T3064 [stat not good enough] (normal) I will look into the two ghc-api ones. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com> wrote:
Oh sorry, no I think I’d been skipping it too. I’ll fix that! Meanwhile, skip!
*From:* ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] *On Behalf Of *Simon Peyton Jones *Sent:* 18 November 2015 11:18 *To:* Alan & Kim Zimmerman *Cc:* ghc-devs@haskell.org *Subject:* RE: Wildcard refactor
It does, yes. It’s on 0d157fe, which is the head of wip/spj-wildcard-refactor in the haddock repo
Is that what get checked out by ‘git submodule update”?
Simon
*From:* Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.zimm@gmail.com <alan.zimm@gmail.com>] *Sent:* 18 November 2015 10:57 *To:* Simon Peyton Jones *Subject:* Re: Wildcard refactor
I found the haddock library did not compile, but I am skipping straight to the tests.
Does it compile for you at the moment?
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Simon Peyton Jones < simonpj@microsoft.com> wrote:
Thank you!
*From:* Alan & Kim Zimmerman [mailto:alan.zimm@gmail.com] *Sent:* 18 November 2015 10:04 *To:* Simon Peyton Jones *Cc:* ghc-devs@haskell.org *Subject:* Re: Wildcard refactor
ok.
I have been waiting to jump in and help.
Alan
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Simon Peyton Jones < simonpj@microsoft.com> wrote:
Alan
I’m really close on wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, that I really want to get into HEAD asap.
Could you possibly checkout wip/spj-wildcard-refactor, and validate? I get two failures I don’t understand:
ghc-api/annotations listcomps [bad stdout] (normal)
ghc-api/landmines landmines [bad stderr] (normal)
The output is not wildly different but I just don’t know how to interpret it, so I don’t even know what the problem is exactly.
NB: you’’ll need to do a ‘git submodule update’ because the haddock submodule changes.
Thank you!
Simon
participants (2)
-
Alan & Kim Zimmerman -
Simon Peyton Jones