
Is anyone else getting an absolute flood of commit emails related to haddock? I remember this happening a little while back with the hadrian merge into the GHC tree. Best, _ara

Ara Adkins
Is anyone else getting an absolute flood of commit emails related to haddock? I remember this happening a little while back with the hadrian merge into the GHC tree.
Indeed it seems that the commit hook is running amuck [1] Herbert, do you know what we can do about this? Cheers, - Ben [1] https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-commits/2017-November/thread.html

I’m getting them too ☹
From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Ara Adkins
Sent: 20 November 2017 21:07
To: GHC developers

I've put a redirect rule on them for now, but given that this is the second
time that it's happened (as far as I know), is it possible to modify the
way in which the commit hook sends notifications for new branches with a
significant history? I don't really know much about the exact message
generation process, but perhaps it is possible to provide a digest when
pushing a new branch. Something that lists the branch name and the number
of commits, for example.
Best,
_ara
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Simon Peyton Jones
I’m getting them too ☹
*From:* ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] *On Behalf Of *Ara Adkins *Sent:* 20 November 2017 21:07 *To:* GHC developers
*Subject:* Commit Notifications Flood Is anyone else getting an absolute flood of commit emails related to haddock? I remember this happening a little while back with the hadrian merge into the GHC tree.
Best,
_ara

Ara Adkins
I've put a redirect rule on them for now, but given that this is the second time that it's happened (as far as I know), is it possible to modify the way in which the commit hook sends notifications for new branches with a significant history? I don't really know much about the exact message generation process, but perhaps it is possible to provide a digest when pushing a new branch. Something that lists the branch name and the number of commits, for example.
Indeed we really should set an upper bound on the number of messages that it will send. I agree that this is quite ridiculous. Cheers, - Ben
participants (3)
-
Ara Adkins
-
Ben Gamari
-
Simon Peyton Jones