Today's validate failures
On x86_64/Linux: Unexpected passes: perf/should_run T149 (normal) Unexpected failures: perf/compiler T3064 [stat too good] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.Cabal [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.base [stat not good enough] (normal) simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile T3772 [bad stdout] (normal) simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile T4930 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm)
I've just pushed fixes to the non-perf ones. | -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-bounces@haskell.org] | On Behalf Of Simon Marlow | Sent: 14 February 2013 10:43 | To: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Today's validate failures | | On x86_64/Linux: | | Unexpected passes: | perf/should_run T149 (normal) | | Unexpected failures: | perf/compiler T3064 [stat too good] (normal) | perf/haddock haddock.Cabal [stat not good enough] | (normal) | perf/haddock haddock.base [stat not good enough] | (normal) | simplCore/should_compile T3717 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile T3772 [bad stdout] (normal) | simplCore/should_compile T4908 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile T4930 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile T7360 [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | simplCore/should_compile spec-inline [stderr mismatch] (optasm) | | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:42:33AM +0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
Unexpected failures: perf/haddock haddock.Cabal [stat not good enough] (normal) perf/haddock haddock.base [stat not good enough] (normal)
I'd guess these were broken by commit c3c9babf10990ccc36451b3758d6f19d749b879d Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com> Date: Wed Feb 13 17:31:34 2013 +0000 Significant (15%) bytes-allocated reduction in haddock.Cabal and haddock.base I'm not sure why, but I'm happy! but I don't know why Simon would get lower allocations. Perhaps something set in mk/validate.mk? Thanks Ian
participants (3)
-
Ian Lynagh -
Simon Marlow -
Simon Peyton-Jones