Hi,
SPJ recently committed:
commit 12332f1add3eb9615a62abb36898819b2e67e865
Author: Simon Peyton Jones
Hi, Am Samstag, den 10.05.2014, 11:42 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
For now I added a reqlib('transformers') to the test, hoping that that helps. But why should the error message mention "transformers" at all when the package import is actually explicit to import "nonexisting"?
that did not help, further supporting my theory that something strange was with SPJ’s work tree. Maybe for some reason transformers got de-registered in your package data base? Can someone else with an up-to-date tree run "make TEST=T5979" and see if it works for him? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org
Hi, Am Samstag, den 10.05.2014, 16:12 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Samstag, den 10.05.2014, 11:42 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
For now I added a reqlib('transformers') to the test, hoping that that helps. But why should the error message mention "transformers" at all when the package import is actually explicit to import "nonexisting"?
that did not help, further supporting my theory that something strange was with SPJ’s work tree. Maybe for some reason transformers got de-registered in your package data base?
Can someone else with an up-to-date tree run "make TEST=T5979" and see if it works for him?
now I also get SPJ’s output. I did not get it until I ran "git submodule update && make", and the reason might be that now, two versions of transformers are registered in the inplace data base $ ./inplace/bin/ghc-pkg list|grep transformers transformers-0.3.0.0 transformers-0.4.0.0 and after $ ./inplace/bin/ghc-pkg unregister transformers-0.3.0.0 I get the original output. Reverting the test output for now. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner e-Mail: mail@joachim-breitner.de Homepage: http://www.joachim-breitner.de Jabber-ID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de
On 2014-05-10 at 18:30:40 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: [...]
now I also get SPJ’s output. I did not get it until I ran "git submodule update && make", and the reason might be that now, two versions of transformers are registered in the inplace data base
$ ./inplace/bin/ghc-pkg list|grep transformers transformers-0.3.0.0 transformers-0.4.0.0 and after $ ./inplace/bin/ghc-pkg unregister transformers-0.3.0.0 I get the original output.
Reverting the test output for now.
very strange... where does transformers-0.3.0.0 come from? does the build-tree contain a second transformers folder?
ghc 7.8 is built with 0.3.0.0 in its global package db right?
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: On 2014-05-10 at 18:30:40 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: [...] now I also get SPJ’s output. I did not get it until I ran "git submodule
update && make", and the reason might be that now, two versions of
transformers are registered in the inplace data base $ ./inplace/bin/ghc-pkg list|grep transformers
transformers-0.3.0.0
transformers-0.4.0.0
and after
$ ./inplace/bin/ghc-pkg unregister transformers-0.3.0.0
I get the original output. Reverting the test output for now. very strange... where does transformers-0.3.0.0 come from? does the
build-tree contain a second transformers folder?
_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
participants (3)
-
Carter Schonwald -
Herbert Valerio Riedel -
Joachim Breitner