Website for viewing proposals

Hi, It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer. Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged? FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how to set up something similar on github. Cheers, Matt

Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)?
| -----Original Message-----
| From: ghc-devs

I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't
seem very official or permanent.
Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper
(https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull
request which also doesn't seem ideal to me.
Matt
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones
Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)?
| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-devs
On Behalf Of Matthew | Pickering | Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 | To: GHC developers | Subject: Website for viewing proposals | | Hi, | | It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC | proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer. | | Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to | automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged? | | FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this | deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how | to set up something similar on github. | | Cheers, | | Matt | _______________________________________________ | ghc-devs mailing list | ghc-devs@haskell.org | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask | ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- | devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 | d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l | RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0

Hi, I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked harder than it should be. Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using sphinx. Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature creep risk: We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely we can use this to tally the votes), and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric process in the first place. But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure for Matthew’s sphinx build. BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has sailed. Cheers, Joachim Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't seem very official or permanent.
Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull request which also doesn't seem ideal to me.
Matt
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones
wrote: Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)?
-----Original Message----- From: ghc-devs
On Behalf Of Matthew Pickering Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 To: GHC developers Subject: Website for viewing proposals Hi,
It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer.
Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged?
FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how to set up something similar on github.
Cheers,
Matt _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0
ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

Having a read-only rendered version of all accepted proposals should
probably be pretty simple---we can even host it in the same repo using
"Github Pages". I don't know that we need anything more complex
than that.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:41 AM Joachim Breitner
Hi,
I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked harder than it should be.
Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using sphinx.
Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature creep risk: We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely we can use this to tally the votes), and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric process in the first place.
But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure for Matthew’s sphinx build.
BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has sailed.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't seem very official or permanent.
Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull request which also doesn't seem ideal to me.
Matt
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones
wrote: Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)?
-----Original Message----- From: ghc-devs
On Behalf Of Matthew Pickering Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 To: GHC developers Subject: Website for viewing proposals Hi,
It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer.
Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged?
FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how to set up something similar on github.
Cheers,
Matt _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0
ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

I agree a simple static site is all it needs, as Joachim points out I
already implemented the basic site generation.
The main question is about where the site lives and what the
deployment mechanism is. If it's tied to the ghc-proposal repo then I
can't do anything but if it's a subdomain of `haskell.org` then I
could be more potent.
Cheers,
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 9:34 PM Iavor Diatchki
Having a read-only rendered version of all accepted proposals should probably be pretty simple---we can even host it in the same repo using "Github Pages". I don't know that we need anything more complex than that.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:41 AM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked harder than it should be.
Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using sphinx.
Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature creep risk: We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely we can use this to tally the votes), and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric process in the first place.
But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure for Matthew’s sphinx build.
BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has sailed.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't seem very official or permanent.
Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull request which also doesn't seem ideal to me.
Matt
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones
wrote: Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)?
-----Original Message----- From: ghc-devs
On Behalf Of Matthew Pickering Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 To: GHC developers Subject: Website for viewing proposals Hi,
It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer.
Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged?
FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how to set up something similar on github.
Cheers,
Matt _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0
ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Hi, given that Matthew already created a sphinx setup, GitHub pages isn’t optimal. You need to use some other CI system like Travis to actually build the page and push it, which I have set up a few times and is possible, not completely straight-forward. What is straight-forward is readthedocs.io, where I essentially just pressed one button and got this: https://ghc-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Neat, isn’t it? I will clean up the section numbering. The only thing I’d like to do before making this official is to use a more permanent URL, in case we move this somewhere else. For that I’d need a haskell.org admin to add a CNAME from ghc-proposals.haskell.org to readthedocs.io CC’ing gershom, hope he is the right contact for this task. Cheers, Joachim Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 13:33 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
Having a read-only rendered version of all accepted proposals should probably be pretty simple---we can even host it in the same repo using "Github Pages". I don't know that we need anything more complex than that.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:41 AM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked harder than it should be.
Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using sphinx.
Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature creep risk: We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely we can use this to tally the votes), and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric process in the first place.
But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure for Matthew’s sphinx build.
BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has sailed.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't seem very official or permanent.
Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull request which also doesn't seem ideal to me.
Matt
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones
wrote: Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)?
-----Original Message----- From: ghc-devs
On Behalf Of Matthew Pickering Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 To: GHC developers Subject: Website for viewing proposals Hi,
It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer.
Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged?
FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how to set up something similar on github.
Cheers,
Matt _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0
ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

Thanks Joachim, that looks good.
I might have a go styling the site this weekend to make it fit in more
with the Haskell.org theme.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:13 PM Joachim Breitner
Hi,
given that Matthew already created a sphinx setup, GitHub pages isn’t optimal. You need to use some other CI system like Travis to actually build the page and push it, which I have set up a few times and is possible, not completely straight-forward. What is straight-forward is readthedocs.io, where I essentially just pressed one button and got this:
https://ghc-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Neat, isn’t it? I will clean up the section numbering.
The only thing I’d like to do before making this official is to use a more permanent URL, in case we move this somewhere else. For that I’d need a haskell.org admin to add a CNAME from
ghc-proposals.haskell.org
to
readthedocs.io
CC’ing gershom, hope he is the right contact for this task.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 13:33 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
Having a read-only rendered version of all accepted proposals should probably be pretty simple---we can even host it in the same repo using "Github Pages". I don't know that we need anything more complex than that.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:41 AM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked harder than it should be.
Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using sphinx.
Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature creep risk: We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely we can use this to tally the votes), and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric process in the first place.
But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure for Matthew’s sphinx build.
BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has sailed.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't seem very official or permanent.
Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull request which also doesn't seem ideal to me.
Matt
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones
wrote: Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)?
-----Original Message----- From: ghc-devs
On Behalf Of Matthew Pickering Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 To: GHC developers Subject: Website for viewing proposals Hi,
It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer.
Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged?
FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how to set up something similar on github.
Cheers,
Matt _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0
ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Hi, Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 23:22 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
I might have a go styling the site this weekend to make it fit in more with the Haskell.org theme.
that’d be awesome. Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

Joachim -- will the readthedocs settings automatically know how to
direct things once the cname is set?
Also, I'd note that the documentation needs a little cleanup to make
clear that this is the page for _accepted_ proposals, not all
proposals -- perhaps it should also link back to the PR tracker as
well? (And also the nice generation makes obvious that there are a few
too many proposals numbered "1" :-)). Along those lines too, perhaps
the name should be bikeshedded a bit for that reason --
ghc-proposals.haskell.org makes it look like that's where I'd go to
get all proposals, not just the accepted ones.
Cheers,
Gershom
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:22 PM Matthew Pickering
Thanks Joachim, that looks good.
I might have a go styling the site this weekend to make it fit in more with the Haskell.org theme.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:13 PM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
given that Matthew already created a sphinx setup, GitHub pages isn’t optimal. You need to use some other CI system like Travis to actually build the page and push it, which I have set up a few times and is possible, not completely straight-forward. What is straight-forward is readthedocs.io, where I essentially just pressed one button and got this:
https://ghc-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Neat, isn’t it? I will clean up the section numbering.
The only thing I’d like to do before making this official is to use a more permanent URL, in case we move this somewhere else. For that I’d need a haskell.org admin to add a CNAME from
ghc-proposals.haskell.org
to
readthedocs.io
CC’ing gershom, hope he is the right contact for this task.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 13:33 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
Having a read-only rendered version of all accepted proposals should probably be pretty simple---we can even host it in the same repo using "Github Pages". I don't know that we need anything more complex than that.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:41 AM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked harder than it should be.
Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using sphinx.
Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature creep risk: We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely we can use this to tally the votes), and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric process in the first place.
But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure for Matthew’s sphinx build.
BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has sailed.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't seem very official or permanent.
Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull request which also doesn't seem ideal to me.
Matt
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones
wrote: Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)?
> -----Original Message----- > From: ghc-devs
On Behalf Of Matthew > Pickering > Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 > To: GHC developers > Subject: Website for viewing proposals > > Hi, > > It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC > proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer. > > Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to > automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged? > > FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this > deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how > to set up something similar on github. > > Cheers, > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask > ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- > devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 > d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l > RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0
ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Hi, Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 18:26 -0400 schrieb Gershom B:
Joachim -- will the readthedocs settings automatically know how to direct things once the cname is set?
yes I have configured things on that side already. Should work right away.
Also, I'd note that the documentation needs a little cleanup to make clear that this is the page for _accepted_ proposals, not all proposals -- perhaps it should also link back to the PR tracker as well? (And also the nice generation makes obvious that there are a few too many proposals numbered "1" :-)).
Reload, both fixed a few minutes ago.
Along those lines too, perhaps the name should be bikeshedded a bit for that reason -- ghc-proposals.haskell.org makes it look like that's where I'd go to get all proposals, not just the accepted ones.
accepted-ghc-proposals.haskell.org doesn’t make a pretty domain name. We will add a intro to that page explaining what this page is, and point to the GitHub repo for more details. Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

Perhaps the correct URL should be
ghc.haskell.org/proposals
but that redirects to https://www.haskell.org/ghc/
So is the correct URL https://www.haskell.org/ghc/proposals ?
Anyway, there should probably be some mention of the proposals process
on the GHC website which is sorely unloved.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:26 PM Gershom B
Joachim -- will the readthedocs settings automatically know how to direct things once the cname is set?
Also, I'd note that the documentation needs a little cleanup to make clear that this is the page for _accepted_ proposals, not all proposals -- perhaps it should also link back to the PR tracker as well? (And also the nice generation makes obvious that there are a few too many proposals numbered "1" :-)). Along those lines too, perhaps the name should be bikeshedded a bit for that reason -- ghc-proposals.haskell.org makes it look like that's where I'd go to get all proposals, not just the accepted ones.
Cheers, Gershom
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:22 PM Matthew Pickering
wrote: Thanks Joachim, that looks good.
I might have a go styling the site this weekend to make it fit in more with the Haskell.org theme.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:13 PM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
given that Matthew already created a sphinx setup, GitHub pages isn’t optimal. You need to use some other CI system like Travis to actually build the page and push it, which I have set up a few times and is possible, not completely straight-forward. What is straight-forward is readthedocs.io, where I essentially just pressed one button and got this:
https://ghc-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Neat, isn’t it? I will clean up the section numbering.
The only thing I’d like to do before making this official is to use a more permanent URL, in case we move this somewhere else. For that I’d need a haskell.org admin to add a CNAME from
ghc-proposals.haskell.org
to
readthedocs.io
CC’ing gershom, hope he is the right contact for this task.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 13:33 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
Having a read-only rendered version of all accepted proposals should probably be pretty simple---we can even host it in the same repo using "Github Pages". I don't know that we need anything more complex than that.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:41 AM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked harder than it should be.
Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using sphinx.
Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature creep risk: We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely we can use this to tally the votes), and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric process in the first place.
But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure for Matthew’s sphinx build.
BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has sailed.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't seem very official or permanent.
Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull request which also doesn't seem ideal to me.
Matt
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones
wrote: > Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ghc-devs On Behalf Of Matthew > > Pickering > > Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 > > To: GHC developers > > Subject: Website for viewing proposals > > > > Hi, > > > > It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC > > proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer. > > > > Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to > > automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged? > > > > FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this > > deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how > > to set up something similar on github. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > > ghc-devs mailing list > > ghc-devs@haskell.org > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask > > ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- > > devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 > > d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l > > RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Hi, unfortunately it has to be a dedicated domain, not an URL on some other domain, to get the easy, no-additional-work hosting from readthedocs. Cheers, Joachim Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 23:30 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
Perhaps the correct URL should be
ghc.haskell.org/proposals
but that redirects to https://www.haskell.org/ghc/
So is the correct URL https://www.haskell.org/ghc/proposals ?
Anyway, there should probably be some mention of the proposals process on the GHC website which is sorely unloved.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:26 PM Gershom B
wrote: Joachim -- will the readthedocs settings automatically know how to direct things once the cname is set?
Also, I'd note that the documentation needs a little cleanup to make clear that this is the page for _accepted_ proposals, not all proposals -- perhaps it should also link back to the PR tracker as well? (And also the nice generation makes obvious that there are a few too many proposals numbered "1" :-)). Along those lines too, perhaps the name should be bikeshedded a bit for that reason -- ghc-proposals.haskell.org makes it look like that's where I'd go to get all proposals, not just the accepted ones.
Cheers, Gershom
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:22 PM Matthew Pickering
wrote: Thanks Joachim, that looks good.
I might have a go styling the site this weekend to make it fit in more with the Haskell.org theme.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:13 PM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
given that Matthew already created a sphinx setup, GitHub pages isn’t optimal. You need to use some other CI system like Travis to actually build the page and push it, which I have set up a few times and is possible, not completely straight-forward. What is straight-forward is readthedocs.io, where I essentially just pressed one button and got this:
https://ghc-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Neat, isn’t it? I will clean up the section numbering.
The only thing I’d like to do before making this official is to use a more permanent URL, in case we move this somewhere else. For that I’d need a haskell.org admin to add a CNAME from
ghc-proposals.haskell.org
to
readthedocs.io
CC’ing gershom, hope he is the right contact for this task.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 13:33 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
Having a read-only rendered version of all accepted proposals should probably be pretty simple---we can even host it in the same repo using "Github Pages". I don't know that we need anything more complex than that.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:41 AM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked harder than it should be.
Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using sphinx.
Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature creep risk: We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely we can use this to tally the votes), and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric process in the first place.
But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure for Matthew’s sphinx build.
BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has sailed.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering: > I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't > seem very official or permanent. > > Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper > (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull > request which also doesn't seem ideal to me. > > Matt > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones >
wrote: > > Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ghc-devs On Behalf Of Matthew > > > Pickering > > > Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 > > > To: GHC developers > > > Subject: Website for viewing proposals > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC > > > proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer. > > > > > > Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to > > > automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged? > > > > > > FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this > > > deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how > > > to set up something similar on github. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Matt > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ghc-devs mailing list > > > ghc-devs@haskell.org > > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask > > > ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- > > > devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 > > > d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l > > > RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0 > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

The GHC website is already deployed by gitlab. It could be possible to
set up a nightly job which clones the ghc-proposals repo and deploys
it in a similar manner.
I do feel that it would be very unfortunate if the proposals were
distant from the supposed official GHC homepage.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:33 PM Joachim Breitner
Hi,
unfortunately it has to be a dedicated domain, not an URL on some other domain, to get the easy, no-additional-work hosting from readthedocs.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 23:30 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
Perhaps the correct URL should be
ghc.haskell.org/proposals
but that redirects to https://www.haskell.org/ghc/
So is the correct URL https://www.haskell.org/ghc/proposals ?
Anyway, there should probably be some mention of the proposals process on the GHC website which is sorely unloved.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:26 PM Gershom B
wrote: Joachim -- will the readthedocs settings automatically know how to direct things once the cname is set?
Also, I'd note that the documentation needs a little cleanup to make clear that this is the page for _accepted_ proposals, not all proposals -- perhaps it should also link back to the PR tracker as well? (And also the nice generation makes obvious that there are a few too many proposals numbered "1" :-)). Along those lines too, perhaps the name should be bikeshedded a bit for that reason -- ghc-proposals.haskell.org makes it look like that's where I'd go to get all proposals, not just the accepted ones.
Cheers, Gershom
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:22 PM Matthew Pickering
wrote: Thanks Joachim, that looks good.
I might have a go styling the site this weekend to make it fit in more with the Haskell.org theme.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:13 PM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
given that Matthew already created a sphinx setup, GitHub pages isn’t optimal. You need to use some other CI system like Travis to actually build the page and push it, which I have set up a few times and is possible, not completely straight-forward. What is straight-forward is readthedocs.io, where I essentially just pressed one button and got this:
https://ghc-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Neat, isn’t it? I will clean up the section numbering.
The only thing I’d like to do before making this official is to use a more permanent URL, in case we move this somewhere else. For that I’d need a haskell.org admin to add a CNAME from
ghc-proposals.haskell.org
to
readthedocs.io
CC’ing gershom, hope he is the right contact for this task.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 13:33 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
Having a read-only rendered version of all accepted proposals should probably be pretty simple---we can even host it in the same repo using "Github Pages". I don't know that we need anything more complex than that.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:41 AM Joachim Breitner
wrote: > Hi, > > I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked > harder than it should be. > > Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on > GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like > ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a > Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using > sphinx. > > Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature > creep risk: > We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, > soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status > (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), > then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely > we can use this to tally the votes), > and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need > to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric > process in the first place. > > But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure > for Matthew’s sphinx build. > > BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after > acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the > PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has > sailed. > > Cheers, > Joachim > > Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering: > > I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't > > seem very official or permanent. > > > > Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper > > (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull > > request which also doesn't seem ideal to me. > > > > Matt > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones > > wrote: > > > Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)? > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: ghc-devs On Behalf Of Matthew > > > > Pickering > > > > Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 > > > > To: GHC developers > > > > Subject: Website for viewing proposals > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC > > > > proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer. > > > > > > > > Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to > > > > automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged? > > > > > > > > FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this > > > > deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how > > > > to set up something similar on github. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > ghc-devs mailing list > > > > ghc-devs@haskell.org > > > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask > > > > ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- > > > > devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 > > > > d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l > > > > RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0 > > _______________________________________________ > > ghc-devs mailing list > > ghc-devs@haskell.org > > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > -- > Joachim Breitner > mail@joachim-breitner.de > http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

Hi, we have a solution that needed 10 mins of setup and is completely self- hosting otherwise, with a proven, open-source friendly provider, at the expense of a possibly odd (but custom) domain name. I think this is very good effort to result ratio. If someone wants do to recreate that manually, that’s ok with it, but maybe I’m too old and lazy to be excited by the process. Anyways, bedtime here. I’ll read tomorrow if we shall use this, of if someone else steps up to be the master of the accepted ghc proposals webpage deployment, and has created something more bespoke (in which I case I can remove the readthedocs setup again). Cheer, Joachim Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 23:34 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
The GHC website is already deployed by gitlab. It could be possible to set up a nightly job which clones the ghc-proposals repo and deploys it in a similar manner.
I do feel that it would be very unfortunate if the proposals were distant from the supposed official GHC homepage.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:33 PM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
unfortunately it has to be a dedicated domain, not an URL on some other domain, to get the easy, no-additional-work hosting from readthedocs.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 23:30 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering:
Perhaps the correct URL should be
ghc.haskell.org/proposals
but that redirects to https://www.haskell.org/ghc/
So is the correct URL https://www.haskell.org/ghc/proposals ?
Anyway, there should probably be some mention of the proposals process on the GHC website which is sorely unloved.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:26 PM Gershom B
wrote: Joachim -- will the readthedocs settings automatically know how to direct things once the cname is set?
Also, I'd note that the documentation needs a little cleanup to make clear that this is the page for _accepted_ proposals, not all proposals -- perhaps it should also link back to the PR tracker as well? (And also the nice generation makes obvious that there are a few too many proposals numbered "1" :-)). Along those lines too, perhaps the name should be bikeshedded a bit for that reason -- ghc-proposals.haskell.org makes it look like that's where I'd go to get all proposals, not just the accepted ones.
Cheers, Gershom
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:22 PM Matthew Pickering
wrote: Thanks Joachim, that looks good.
I might have a go styling the site this weekend to make it fit in more with the Haskell.org theme.
Matt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:13 PM Joachim Breitner
wrote: Hi,
given that Matthew already created a sphinx setup, GitHub pages isn’t optimal. You need to use some other CI system like Travis to actually build the page and push it, which I have set up a few times and is possible, not completely straight-forward. What is straight-forward is readthedocs.io, where I essentially just pressed one button and got this:
https://ghc-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Neat, isn’t it? I will clean up the section numbering.
The only thing I’d like to do before making this official is to use a more permanent URL, in case we move this somewhere else. For that I’d need a haskell.org admin to add a CNAME from
ghc-proposals.haskell.org
to
readthedocs.io
CC’ing gershom, hope he is the right contact for this task.
Cheers, Joachim
Am Freitag, den 10.05.2019, 13:33 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki: > Having a read-only rendered version of all accepted proposals should > probably be pretty simple---we can even host it in the same repo using > "Github Pages". I don't know that we need anything more complex > than that. > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:41 AM Joachim Breitner >
wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I looked into getting doi’s for our accepted proposals, but it looked > > harder than it should be. > > > > Building a nice web page from our repository and publishing it on > > GitHub pages, which can serve a custom domain like > > ghc-proposals.haskell.org would not be hard. Matthew even started a > > Makefile at some point that produces a reasonably nice output using > > sphinx. > > > > Maybe only reason why I am hesitant to do so is that there is a feature > > creep risk: > > We start with a webpage that shows accepted proposals, > > soon we’ll add functionality to list pending proposals and their status > > (why not? They are just a GitHub API call away), > > then we start using this page to actually drive the proposals (surely > > we can use this to tally the votes), > > and then we end up with a system that no longer has the “you just need > > to know GitHub to use it” property that made us build a Github-centric > > process in the first place. > > > > But maybe I am paranoid, and I should just set up the CI infrastructure > > for Matthew’s sphinx build. > > > > BTW, in hindsight, I regret that we renumber proposals after > > acceptance. It would be easier if they just retained the number of the > > PR (other proposal processes out there do that). But that ship has > > sailed. > > > > Cheers, > > Joachim > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:45 +0100 schrieb Matthew Pickering: > > > I want to cite a GHC proposal but linking to github for it doesn't > > > seem very official or permanent. > > > > > > Last year you also cited a proposal for your Haskell symposium paper > > > (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03476) but instead linked to the pull > > > request which also doesn't seem ideal to me. > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Simon Peyton Jones > > > wrote: > > > > Interesting. How would it differ from what we have (i.e. github's RST viewer)? > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: ghc-devs On Behalf Of Matthew > > > > > Pickering > > > > > Sent: 09 May 2019 09:40 > > > > > To: GHC developers > > > > > Subject: Website for viewing proposals > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful if there was a canonical way to link and view GHC > > > > > proposals rather than relying on github's RST viewer. > > > > > > > > > > Can we set up a website, `ghc.haskell.org/proposals`, which is deployed to > > > > > automatically when a new accepted proposal is merged? > > > > > > > > > > FWIW, if the proposals process was also on gitlab then doing this > > > > > deployment would be easy using our CI infrastructure but I don't know how > > > > > to set up something similar on github. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > ghc-devs mailing list > > > > > ghc-devs@haskell.org > > > > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.hask > > > > > ell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc- > > > > > devs&data=01%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7C33b5834164a1436bd09308d6 > > > > > d459edc0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=vWx4R2xtV2%2BX7l > > > > > RpM0weHo87NIc7pl0MoIiW76R%2BDdM%3D&reserved=0 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ghc-devs mailing list > > > ghc-devs@haskell.org > > > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > > -- > > Joachim Breitner > > mail@joachim-breitner.de > > http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ghc-devs mailing list > > ghc-devs@haskell.org > > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
participants (5)
-
Gershom B
-
Iavor Diatchki
-
Joachim Breitner
-
Matthew Pickering
-
Simon Peyton Jones