RE: [GHC] #1614: Type checker does not use functional dependency to avoid ambiguity
Morabbin, what's the semantics of "bump"? I don't know what you intend by it! Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-tickets-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-tickets-bounces@haskell.org] | On Behalf Of GHC | Sent: 26 January 2013 22:12 | Cc: ghc-tickets@haskell.org | Subject: Re: [GHC] #1614: Type checker does not use functional dependency to | avoid ambiguity | | #1614: Type checker does not use functional dependency to avoid ambiguity | --------------------------------------+------------------------------------- | Reporter: guest | Owner: | Type: bug | Status: new | Priority: normal | Milestone: _|_ | Component: Compiler (Type checker) | Version: 6.7 | Resolution: | Keywords: | Os: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Failure: None/Unknown | Difficulty: Unknown | Testcase: | Blockedby: | Blocking: | Related: | --------------------------------------+------------------------------------- | Changes (by morabbin): | | * failure: => None/Unknown | | | Comment: | | Bump; chak saya this was fixed in HEAD, and then SPJ closes as wontfix? | Was the fix backed out? | | -- | Ticket URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1614#comment:11 | GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ | The Glasgow Haskell Compiler | | _______________________________________________ | ghc-tickets mailing list | ghc-tickets@haskell.org | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-tickets
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:15:56PM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Morabbin, what's the semantics of "bump"? I don't know what you intend by it!
I think the intention is just to draw attention to the ticket. By the way, thanks for looking at our old tickets! Adding a comment to a ticket which looks like it it could now be easily closed, or where it is unclear what the status is (as with this ticket), or where some other easy action is needed, is very useful. If there's a particular bug that's affecting you, then adding a comment to it is also useful, as it helps us prioritise. However, I think that just adding a comment like "Bump; still relevant." such as in http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1526#comment:7 is counter-productive, as all open tickets are assumed to still be relevant by default, so it just generates mails that people then spend time reading and deleting. Thanks Ian
| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-tickets-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-tickets-bounces@haskell.org] | On Behalf Of GHC | Sent: 26 January 2013 22:12 | Cc: ghc-tickets@haskell.org | Subject: Re: [GHC] #1614: Type checker does not use functional dependency to | avoid ambiguity | | #1614: Type checker does not use functional dependency to avoid ambiguity | --------------------------------------+------------------------------------- | Reporter: guest | Owner: | Type: bug | Status: new | Priority: normal | Milestone: _|_ | Component: Compiler (Type checker) | Version: 6.7 | Resolution: | Keywords: | Os: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Failure: None/Unknown | Difficulty: Unknown | Testcase: | Blockedby: | Blocking: | Related: | --------------------------------------+------------------------------------- | Changes (by morabbin): | | * failure: => None/Unknown | | | Comment: | | Bump; chak saya this was fixed in HEAD, and then SPJ closes as wontfix? | Was the fix backed out? | | -- | Ticket URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1614#comment:11 | GHC http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ | The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
participants (2)
-
Ian Lynagh -
Simon Peyton-Jones