
Does anybody have a clue what's going wrong at the sdist step here? https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/OpenGLRaw/jobs/38707011#L104 This only happens with a GHC from head, a build with GHC 7.8.3 is fine: https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/OpenGLRaw/jobs/38707010 Any help highly appreciated... Cheers, S.

2014-10-22 15:16 GMT+02:00 Sven Panne
Does anybody have a clue what's going wrong at the sdist step here?
https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/OpenGLRaw/jobs/38707011#L104
This only happens with a GHC from head, a build with GHC 7.8.3 is fine:
https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/OpenGLRaw/jobs/38707010
Any help highly appreciated...
I would really need some help here, even adding a few more diagnostic things to the Travis CI configuration didn't give me a clue what's going wrong: https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/OpenGLRaw/jobs/38813449#L110 I totally fail to understand why Cabal's sdist step works with every released compiler, but not with a GHC from head. I don't even know if this is a Cabal issue or a GHC issue. The relevant part from the Travis CI log is: ... cabal-1.18 sdist --verbose=3 creating dist/src creating dist/src/sdist.-3586/OpenGLRaw-1.5.0.0 Using internal setup method with build-type Simple and args: ["sdist","--verbose=3","--builddir=dist","--output-directory=dist/src/sdist.-3586/OpenGLRaw-1.5.0.0"] cabal-1.18: dist/setup-config: invalid argument The command "cabal-1.18 sdist --verbose=3" exited with 1. ... As can be seen from the log, dist/setup-config is there and can be accessed. Confused, S.

cabal has changed for HEAD, you need to install 1.21.1.0
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Sven Panne
2014-10-22 15:16 GMT+02:00 Sven Panne
: Does anybody have a clue what's going wrong at the sdist step here?
https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/OpenGLRaw/jobs/38707011#L104
This only happens with a GHC from head, a build with GHC 7.8.3 is fine:
https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/OpenGLRaw/jobs/38707010
Any help highly appreciated...
I would really need some help here, even adding a few more diagnostic things to the Travis CI configuration didn't give me a clue what's going wrong:
https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/OpenGLRaw/jobs/38813449#L110
I totally fail to understand why Cabal's sdist step works with every released compiler, but not with a GHC from head. I don't even know if this is a Cabal issue or a GHC issue. The relevant part from the Travis CI log is:
... cabal-1.18 sdist --verbose=3 creating dist/src creating dist/src/sdist.-3586/OpenGLRaw-1.5.0.0 Using internal setup method with build-type Simple and args:
["sdist","--verbose=3","--builddir=dist","--output-directory=dist/src/sdist.-3586/OpenGLRaw-1.5.0.0"] cabal-1.18: dist/setup-config: invalid argument The command "cabal-1.18 sdist --verbose=3" exited with 1. ...
As can be seen from the log, dist/setup-config is there and can be accessed.
Confused, S. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

2014-10-23 15:01 GMT+02:00 Alan & Kim Zimmerman
cabal has changed for HEAD, you need to install 1.21.1.0
Hmmm, so we *force* people to update? o_O Perhaps I've missed an announcement, and I really have a hard time deducing this from the output on Travis CI. Is 1.21.1.0 backwards-compatible to previous GHCs? Or do I have to set up something more or less complicated depending on the GHC version (which would be unfortunate)?

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Sven Panne
2014-10-23 15:01 GMT+02:00 Alan & Kim Zimmerman
: cabal has changed for HEAD, you need to install 1.21.1.0
Hmmm, so we *force* people to update? o_O Perhaps I've missed an announcement, and I really have a hard time deducing this from the output on Travis CI. Is 1.21.1.0 backwards-compatible to previous GHCs? Or do I have to set up something more or less complicated depending on the GHC version (which would be unfortunate)? _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
Just to be clear, Cabal will always support every major GHC version going back several years. I think it even supports GHC 6.12 still and Duncan tests with it. But, sometimes a GHC change may require you to use a newer version of Cabal, for things to work. So this just means that Cabal isn't necessarily *future compatible* with future GHCs - they may change the package format, etc. But it is backwards compatible with existing ones. -- Regards, Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/

2014-10-30 17:20 GMT+01:00 Austin Seipp
[...] So this just means that Cabal isn't necessarily *future compatible* with future GHCs - they may change the package format, etc. But it is backwards compatible with existing ones.
OK, that's good to know. To be sure, I've just tested Cabal head + GHC 7.8.3, and it works. But as I've mentioned already, there seems to be *no* Cabal version which works with GHC head: https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/StateVar/builds/39533448 Is this known to the Cabal people?

I would imagine they are well aware, what with all the changes that
have gone in the past few weeks (for backpack support, package db
overhauls, etc).
However, I think crux of it (and the real question) isn't are they
aware - but "When will there be a Cabal release that supports GHC
HEAD, which will become 7.10"? This is a question I'm afraid I cannot
answer - Johan does the typical Cabal releases, AFAIK.
I've CC'd Duncan and Johan - do either of you have plans for this?
Considering we hope the stable freeze will happen soon for 7.10, I
imagine Cabal won't be very far behind in this regard, but I'm not
sure if there's a plan set down anywhere as to when the next release
will happen.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Sven Panne
2014-10-30 17:20 GMT+01:00 Austin Seipp
: [...] So this just means that Cabal isn't necessarily *future compatible* with future GHCs - they may change the package format, etc. But it is backwards compatible with existing ones.
OK, that's good to know. To be sure, I've just tested Cabal head + GHC 7.8.3, and it works. But as I've mentioned already, there seems to be *no* Cabal version which works with GHC head: https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/StateVar/builds/39533448 Is this known to the Cabal people?
-- Regards, Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/

Hi,
On 30 October 2014 21:30, Sven Panne
2014-10-30 17:20 GMT+01:00 Austin Seipp
: [...] So this just means that Cabal isn't necessarily *future compatible* with future GHCs - they may change the package format, etc. But it is backwards compatible with existing ones.
OK, that's good to know. To be sure, I've just tested Cabal head + GHC 7.8.3, and it works. But as I've mentioned already, there seems to be *no* Cabal version which works with GHC head: https://travis-ci.org/haskell-opengl/StateVar/builds/39533448 Is this known to the Cabal people?
Yes, I know that the Cabal test suite wasn't passing on GHC HEAD for some time. Re: the next release - I think it'll be out at the same time with GHC 7.10.1.
participants (4)
-
Alan & Kim Zimmerman
-
Austin Seipp
-
Mikhail Glushenkov
-
Sven Panne