Failing tests: literals T5681 annotations

Hi, the CI weather is bad these days. Maybe a broken-window-effect? I currently observe Unexpected results from: TEST="literals T5681 annotations" Details: Compile failed (status 256) errors were: /tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:26:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_zdwwork_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:46:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_work_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:66:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main1_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:86:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:106:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main2_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:126:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `ZCMain_main_info$def' {.text section} *** unexpected failure for T5681(optllvm) =====> T8131(optllvm) 1496 of 4230 [0, 1, 0] Wrong exit code (expected 0 , actual 2 ) Stdout: Stderr: /usr/bin/ld: reopening annotations.o: No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld:annotations.o: bfd_stat failed: No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld: reopening annotations.o: No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/merge.c line 873 in _bfd_merged_section_offset /usr/bin/ld: Please report this bug. collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [annotations] Error 1 *** unexpected failure for annotations(normal) Wrong exit code (expected 0 , actual 2 ) Stdout: Stderr: /usr/bin/ld: reopening literals.o: No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld:literals.o: bfd_stat failed: No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld: reopening literals.o: No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/merge.c line 873 in _bfd_merged_section_offset /usr/bin/ld: Please report this bug. collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [literals] Error 1 *** unexpected failure for literals(normal) Does anyone feel responsible? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org

Hi, Am Samstag, den 22.11.2014, 11:35 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I currently observe
Unexpected results from: TEST="literals T5681 annotations"
this has improved to just TEST="T5681 annotations" but still this needs some investigation. Maybe a problem with parallel test runs and temporary files cleaned out too quickly?
Details:
Compile failed (status 256) errors were: /tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:26:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_zdwwork_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:46:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_work_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:66:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main1_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:86:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:106:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main2_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc13786_0/ghc13786_5.s:126:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `ZCMain_main_info$def' {.text section}
*** unexpected failure for T5681(optllvm)
*** unexpected failure for annotations(normal)
Wrong exit code (expected 0 , actual 2 ) Stdout:
Stderr: /usr/bin/ld: reopening literals.o: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/ld:literals.o: bfd_stat failed: No such file or directory /usr/bin/ld: reopening literals.o: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/merge.c line 873 in _bfd_merged_section_offset
/usr/bin/ld: Please report this bug.
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [literals] Error 1
*** unexpected failure for literals(normal)
Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org

Hi, I’m still seeing this failure: Compile failed (status 256) errors were: /tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:26:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_zdwwork_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:46:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_work_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:66:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main1_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:86:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:106:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main2_info$def' {.text section} /tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:126:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `ZCMain_main_info$def' {.text section} *** unexpected failure for T5681(optllvm) https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/42557559/log.txt Any ideas? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 30.11.2014, 20:01 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I’m still seeing this failure:
Compile failed (status 256) errors were: /tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:26:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_zdwwork_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:46:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_work_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:66:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main1_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:86:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:106:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main2_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:126:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `ZCMain_main_info$def' {.text section}
*** unexpected failure for T5681(optllvm)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/42557559/log.txt
Any ideas?
is it possible that this is due the llvm version used? Do we support 3.4 in GHC HEAD? Using LLVM tools llc : /usr/local/clang-3.4/bin/llc opt : /usr/local/clang-3.4/bin/opt Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Joachim Breitner
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 30.11.2014, 20:01 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I’m still seeing this failure:
Compile failed (status 256) errors were: /tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:26:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_zdwwork_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:46:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_work_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:66:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main1_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:86:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:106:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `Main_main2_info$def' {.text section}
/tmp/ghc16123_0/ghc16123_5.s:126:0: Error: can't resolve `.rodata' {.rodata section} - `ZCMain_main_info$def' {.text section}
*** unexpected failure for T5681(optllvm)
https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/42557559/log.txt
Any ideas?
is it possible that this is due the llvm version used? Do we support 3.4 in GHC HEAD?
Using LLVM tools llc : /usr/local/clang-3.4/bin/llc opt : /usr/local/clang-3.4/bin/opt
This appears to affect all programs built with llvm-3.4. I filed a ticket ( http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9929). Regards, Reid Barton
participants (2)
-
Joachim Breitner
-
Reid Barton