Dear Committee, we are getting into the third week of voting. Still missing Cale’s votes, but he promised to me off-band that he’ll work on it right now. Maybe not unsurprising, but while many of the 100-something decisions we have signed up to make are clear, some are not. I am wondering a bit if ⅔ quorum was a bad choice, and a higher quota would have put the critical line into a less contentious area. But probably _any_ quorum causes plenty of discussions around the extensions that are near that line. So how shall we continue? Simply stick to the process, have another week of discussions, pleas and clarifications, maybe shift this or that extension across the line, and then simply go with whatever we have end of next Monday? Or should we continue discussions until there is pretty much consensus about everything? (Probably won’t happen, though) Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/