9 Jul
2023
9 Jul
'23
6:49 a.m.
Maybe the proposal template could include a section about potential CLC interactions, to take advantage of the pre-submission discussion. People usually debate minute details on there quite eagerly, and it would provide a contact point and overview for CLC members. On 7/9/23 12:19, Joachim Breitner wrote:
There is clearly an mismatch here that seems to be hard to resolve without changing at least one of the two processes (which are like that for good reasons). But at least we should try to make this transparent: Get a (non-binding) positive assessment of the CLC on proposals that touch base when accepting a GHC proposal, and communicate the need to get final approval when the implementation is done