Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Question about "Add Unified Namespace" (#270)

My interpretation is that as soon as discussion (that might change the content of the proposal) picks up, the proposal should go back into the discussion state. It's not good for us to have "pending recommendation" for a long time. Richard

On Oct 15, 2019, at 7:37 PM, Iavor Diatchki wrote:

Hello,

I am the shepherd for #270, "Add Unified Namesapce", which was submitted for us to review around September 25. I read the proposal when it was submitted, but pretty much since then there has been continuing discussion with various new ideas being fleshed out.

So, I've been waiting for things to stabilize a bit, before I re-read it, and ask for feedback from the committee. Given that it has been about 3 weeks, and there are still more comments and suggestions, I was wondering if it would be appropriate to move it back to the "discussion" phase, or if we should leave things as they are and keep waiting.

Thoughts?

-Iavor _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee