Dear Committee, after 2½ months, time for a new status updates. What was going on here? * Well, GHC2021 was going on. Lots of it. But it’s actually coming to a close in five days. It will be exciting to see how it affects the Haskell landscapes. * Heh, last status I wrote: Richard refines the bylaws in #360. Maybe everybody has a second look now and then we can merge this? I guess that still applies. Richard and I are discussing a corner case on the PR, but otherwise approvals are coming in, and unless that changes, we’ll merge that once we ironed out that wrinkle. * Simon introduced the position of a nudger, namely Tom. Tom, below are some PRs where you might need to nudge someone! * we were asked to review these proposals: #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access, shepherd: Tom #242: Unsaturated type families, Shepherd: Richard Eisenberg #370: Syntax for Modifiers, Shepherd: Alejandro #387: The Char kind, Shepherd: Alejandro #368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators, Shepherd: Tom #381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms, Shepherd: Iavor * we have a recommendation from the shepherd about: #369: Add sumToTag# primop, (rec: accept) #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access (rec: accept) #381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms (rec: reject) #242: Unsaturated type families (rec: accept) #313: Delimited continuation primops (rec: accept) #370: Syntax for Modifiers (rec: accept) #387: The Char kind (rec: accept) * we have sent the following proposals back to revision #283: Local modules * we decided about the following proposals #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access (accept) #370: Syntax for Modifiers (accept) #242: Unsaturated type families (accept) In addition to the two meta-proposals (bylaws and GHC2021), we currently have to act on the following 7 proposals, up by 2! Some need some nudging. ## Waiting for committee decision #387: The Char kind, Shepherd: Alejandro Looks like it’ll be smoothly accepted, but it’s only a week old. Will maybe merge in a few days. #381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms, Shepherd: Iavor Recommendation was to reject, but discussion went into the more abstract “whither dependent Haskell”. But what does this mean for this proposal? #369: Add sumToTag# primop Essentially accepted, waiting for feedback from the author on final tweaks #313: Delimited continuation primops, Shepherd: Simon Marlow Mostly positive reception, but there was discussion. Simon, can this be accepted as it, or does it need more work/time/discussion? #302: \of, Shepherd: Cale No new discussion. Cale, what is the conclusion? ## Waiting for Shepherd action #367: Clarify primops using unboxed sums, Shepherd: Simon Marlow This is aging… we need a shepherd recommendation #368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators, Shepherd: Tom Tom, your turn Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/