
24 Jun
2020
24 Jun
'20
7:57 a.m.
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 24.06.2020, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
A. By having shepherds reach out to community members external to the committee who can share their expert opinion B. By maintaining a list of constituencies that the committee membership covers (ideally)
These can be combined, or we could do neither. (Right now, we do neither.)
I think we have sometimes used A. For example with the proposal about Arrow something, we (or the author?) reached out the likely affected library authors. I am slightly favoring A (less formal, less process overhead, maybe more flexible). Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/