Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Please review #517: Require implementors before proposal submission, Shepherd: Simon PJ

I'm rather in the “against” camp, for now. I'm fine with accepting designs without necessarily an implementer attached to them. At least a priori. But I don't really have data: how many unimplemented proposals do we have? What do other communities do? (say Rust, Ocaml, who both have a proposal process). So maybe I can be convinced. /Arnaud On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:48 PM Richard Eisenberg wrote:

On Aug 19, 2022, at 4:44 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Simon, Richad and Chris in support. Any other opinions? Or should I just merge this?

It would be Really Nice to have more opinions on this one. It's a substantial change to our workflow, and I would expect a move like this to be best with a solid majority of us actively in favor (which I am).

Can the other voices join the conversation, please?

Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee