Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Please review: Lazy unboxed tuples, Shepherd: Ryan Newton

Hi, it is by Richard, I just got the URL wrong. The right pull request is https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/35 sorry for that. Using this thread is fine. Joachim Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2017, 10:58 -0400 schrieb Ryan Newton:

Just to clarify, this is proposed by a user "winterland".  I.e. not Richard, right? In the process document it is the author that "brings it before the committee" correct?

I checked and it looks like our process document does not specify the means of our committee discussion.  I propose we discuss this one right here on this thread, which we've already got sitting in our inboxes.

Best,   -Ryan

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:

...

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/45 was brought before the committee, by our own Richard.

I propose Ryan Newton as the Shepherd, just to rotate this role properly.

Ryan, please reach consensus as described in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with you.

Greetings, Joachim

-- Joachim Breitner   mail@joachim-breitner.de   http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

-- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner   mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/   XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F   Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org