
On Apr 1, 2021, at 3:59 AM, Vladislav Zavialov (int-index)
mailto:vlad.z.4096@gmail.com> wrote: Exporting from Prelude is not a panacea: without a compatibility fallback, users of custom preludes will be affected. The proposed migration story means that for 8 releases, no existing code will break at all.
Right. I wasn't suggesting a change to the migration plan -- just that (~) would additionally be exported from the Prelude. The warning would trigger only when (~) isn't in scope, meaning that many users won't need to react to this change (given that -XTypeOperators is now on by default). As for the specialness of ~: yes, it's special, but we export other special things from the Prelude, like $ (which automatically enables -XImpredicativeTypes).
On Apr 1, 2021, at 9:59 AM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
mailto:trupill@gmail.com> wrote: I meant the usual convention that type constructors must start with a capital letter or the : symbol. But in this case I had forgotten that with TypeOperators on, those conventions behave differently for types than for terms.
This used to be true, but the requirement that the first letter be a capital letter or : was dropped some time ago -- before I started using Haskell, in any case. It is independent of -XTypeOperators, which is necessary for any infix type level syntax.
But those custom preludes would have to be updated anyway, right?
Yes, they would. Richard