Hi, thanks for picking this up. My initial thought after Am Montag, dem 11.12.2023 um 13:39 +0100 schrieb Vladislav Zavialov:
2. The Modifiers proposal is, however, unimplemented
was that if nothing has moved here since a year (last thread was Dec 2022), then maybe it’s better to not hold NoFieldSelectors hostage, and would have voted “Accept the proposal with pragma-based syntax, then deprecate it and switch to modifiers-based syntax” (with an implicit “… when and if modifiers becomes reality”). But given
Before you vote, let me try to sway you towards the "revise" option. If we choose to revise, I volunteer to implement Modifiers in time for GHC 9.12. I believe Modifiers are a splendid idea and I envision many good uses for them.
then “Revise the proposal to use modifiers-based syntax and then accept” is plausible. So I’ll vote * [x] Accept the proposal with pragma-based syntax, then deprecate it and switch to modifiers-based syntax * [ ] Accept the proposal with pragma-based syntax, do not switch to modifiers-based syntax * [x] Revise the proposal to use modifiers-based syntax and then accept * [ ] Reject the proposal regardless of syntax Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/