Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 17.04.2019, 14:00 -0400 schrieb Eric Seidel:
Good point. I've noticed that as well. We get to a point where everyone has made their position fairly clear, but there's no consensus. And then things linger..
if there is really disagreement, then we vote. At least that the process. It is a fallback (and I think we never needed it), but there is a way forward. It would be up to the shepherd to determine that it is time to vote.
I'm not really sure what to do in this case either. Perhaps a default response would make sense. Another option would be that when we reach an impasse, we reach out to the author and invite them to address the concerns directly.
Well, we now want to involve the author during the discussion anyways, so hopefully this will not be needed. Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/