Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Record dot syntax: vote results

I've read through the draft and think it does a nice job of addressing the various camps. I like how you've positioned C2a as a conservative initial direction with room for future extensions, and a set of minimal requirements for future extensions. I'm not particularly fond of the existing ideas for parsing `(e).x` but I support the principle behind it. Thanks! On Tue, Mar 31, 2020, at 06:08, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-steering-committee wrote:

Thanks Joachim.

Everyone: I have extended our choices document with a draft post to the Github thread. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MgovHRUUNjbuM4nM8qEe308MfbAYRh2Q8PxFHl7i...

Can you review it, for both tone and content? You have edit permission, so by all means improve the wording. Look for omissions. I want to bring the discussion to a close, not re-ignite further debate, but be respectful of those who disagree.

Could you do so this week, by end Friday? I propose to leave the votes recorded there, but when posting I'll move the post from the document (deleting it from there) to GitHub.

I'm cc'ing Neil and Shayne, the authors. Neil, Shayne: I think (and desperately hope!) you'll be content with this outcome. Can you review my draft post too?

Simon

| -----Original Message----- | From: ghc-steering-committee | On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner | Sent: 30 March 2020 17:48 | To: ghc-steering-committee | Subject: Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Record dot syntax: vote results | | Dear Committe, | | thanks all for voting. The ranking of votes is now | | C2a > C2b > C4 > C1 > C7 > C6 > C3 > C5 | | In particular C2a beats every other options by 7:4 or more, and is | therefore the result of this poll. | | You can see more statistics at | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cond | orcet.vote%2FVote%2FAB23CE70AC%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.c | om%7Ce27e9c8f455b436e2bee08d7d4ca3538%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7 | C1%7C0%7C637211837260982595&sdata=LLWCxVjXxyLqcJUZ9iMgB%2B5QYGMuHFzJga | u9agTakiQ%3D&reserved=0 | | So, does this conclude this saga? | | Cheers, | Joachim | | -- | Joachim Breitner | mail@joachim-breitner.de | | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joach | im- | breitner.de%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ce27e9c8f455b43 | 6e2bee08d7d4ca3538%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6372118372 | 60982595&sdata=GE%2BBYN7rA7zWgwuKlArv4PR%2Fm3IlmZ7PqWbGpgXUyms%3D& | reserved=0 | | | _______________________________________________ | ghc-steering-committee mailing list | ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org | https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.has | kell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-steering- | committee&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ce27e9c8f455b436e2be | e08d7d4ca3538%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637211837260982 | 595&sdata=nEx7qjYqnST1TA74HRkgK4O1zW3tvqpM4Dx4ECCig7I%3D&reserved= | 0 _______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee