I also agree with acceptance now.
Alejandro
On 12 Apr 2021 at 09:17:38, Joachim Breitner
I concur.
Am Sonntag, den 11.04.2021, 14:27 -0400 schrieb Eric Seidel:
Thanks, I'm happy with the proposal now.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021, at 14:47, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
Hi all,
The author of #402 (our own Vladislav) has modified it to remove the
bit about dropping parentheses. The proposal is now solely about
liberalizing the existing syntax to allow arbitrary nesting of
quantifiers in non-record constructors. My recommendation remains to
accept.
Are there other further thoughts here?
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee