6 May
2020
6 May
'20
10:28 a.m.
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2020, 15:55 +0200 schrieb Spiwack, Arnaud:
There is one question to solve: should we use the standard names `(>>=)`, `(>>)` for desugaring? (so that the type class methods can be used directly). Or some dedicated names `desugaringBind`, … ? To avoid name clashes.
given that the recommended idiom is to only use this with a qualified module name, I think using the normal, well-known names is reasonable. Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/