Hi, Am Dienstag, den 16.05.2017, 10:19 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
I'd like to propose that we reject that NoIfThenElse proposal (#44).
proceduraly, this is not required. This proposal never made it out of the discussion phase, and is actually “dormant” right now (together with plenty of other proposals that never made it out of the discussion procedure). While everyone is free to voice their opinions on such proposals, the comment section on the pull request is more appropriate for that. Likely, the author might eventually withdraws the proposal. Note that dormant proposals do not even show up in the “List of proposals under discussion” linked from https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals. If you are curious what actually is on the committee’s plate right now, this would be the following. Eval class https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/27 Shepherd: Richard Status: This came back after being sent to the author for revision. We are waiting for Richard to make a new decision suggestion. Force Instance https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/23 Shepherd: Manuel Status: Manuel suggests rejection, which is generally agreed by the committee. Manuel, I believe you can go ahead and reject the proposal, ideally with a short rationale. UNPACK on function arguments https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/46 Shepherd: Simon Marlow Status: Awaiting a recommendation from Simon Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org