Re: [ghc-steering-committee] committee deliberation discussions

I recall a non-committee member posting to the list a few months ago to try to clarify something in our discussion. So it must be possible, I think it’s just much more obvious to the public that the list is primarily for committee discussions. I’ve also had trouble tracking which proposals are in an active committee deliberation. I’d favor some sort of hybrid model where we have discussions on the list, but don’t immediately reject proposals without inviting the author to address our concerns. Another option could be to invite the author to join the committee discussion on the list from the beginning. Then there’s a bit less back and forth between GitHub and the list. Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 18, 2019, at 08:03, Richard Eisenberg wrote:

I thought they were, but perhaps I'm wrong. I've contacted Ben, the owner of the list, to volunteer to become the new list owner since Ben's departure. Then we can decide how to turn the knobs.

Richard

...

On Jul 18, 2019, at 5:46 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 17.07.2019, 11:30 -0400 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:

...

Alternatively, we can set up the mailing list so that non-member posts are moderated instead of auto-rejected.

are they rejected? I hope not: The mailing list is the recommended point of contact if someone wants to talk to the committee:

https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/#who-is-the-committee

Cheers, Joachim

-- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

_______________________________________________ ghc-steering-committee mailing list ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee