
It sounds like we have enough support here to declare this accepted. I will do so now. Thanks, all! Richard
On May 10, 2021, at 1:57 AM, Spiwack, Arnaud
wrote: It's not a very concrete statement. I'll have to trust you on this.
I guess that if `~` doesn't get special parsing rules then it's an overridable name. This is good. And everything which can simplify the parser is welcome. So let me vote: aye.
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:16 PM Richard Eisenberg
mailto:rae@richarde.dev> wrote: On Mar 31, 2021, at 10:29 AM, Spiwack, Arnaud
mailto:arnaud.spiwack@tweag.io> wrote: Those of us who have been involved in the parts of the compiler that are touched here: do you think this is a worthwhile simplification?
Yes, I think so. Every special widget in the language takes custom support, and this removes one. The implementation of `~` will still be somewhat special, but there's no reason the parsing, etc., needs to be.
Richard